This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Oh snap - I've ridden all of these. I didn't realise. Not quite as neat as @davidm's collection, but it made me realise I'd at least done them all.
So since I've ridden the lot, they can scrap them all tomorrow for all I care.
Yeah, this makes a lot of sense. I wasn't really following the construction and had it in my head it was still another 12/18 months off.
I should imagine so. Though imagine there's some interesting meetings on that happening in private! :D
Oh if they were nearly done (which, to be honest was further along than I thought it was), then that seems a lot more plausible as there'd be a lot of 'rework' to do. Good info, thanks.
Open question - is that the additional cost due to the fire, or the cost to get it completed?
I agree, that sounds awfully high (even notwithstanding the extra faff of surveying the damaged elements), and makes me think that could include finishing the stuff they hadn't done already (finishing...
They probably don't, but they also probably have insurance. That's usually where these things go (heck - even the likes of the big banks tend to pay their regulatory fines from insurance rather than their cash reserves).
I would be surprised if they don't appeal the decision (if they can). If...
Moved across to the USJ thread. :)
It looks like one of those things that may look a bit rubbish in POVs and require the actual on-ride experience to work well (for example, the camera seemed to be obstructed by the front of the train for quite a bit of this). Then again, it's hard to see how...
The real world isn't that exact. The judge will have been through the thought process - I reckon about a third of the blame lies with the family (presumably not supervising the kid, in short) and two thirds lies with the park (having unsecured high risk areas). Well 33.3% is a pain in the butt...
I think important detail there is that they did attribute 35% of the blame to the family too, so the net award was 'only' $5.3m. Sounds like a pretty horrendous accident nonetheless!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.